We're on Facebook, and if you've followed the news about the
great divide on the social networks, you know that liberal Facebook
users share a common bubble per algorithm. So we only see what other
liberals think and say (same for conservatives). And even if you're not
on Facebook but on the mailing lists of The New York Times, The New
Yorker, The London Book Review, etc., you know by now that the
commentary---the commentary that you
see---is adamant that we
shouldn't be fooled by Trump's recent, concessionary posture. He'll be
his true self again in the White House, he'll live up to his election
promises, and bring the world down.
|
He floats in the worldly Manhattan society. |
What
if he doesn't? He's run some sort of business empire for 40 years---not
as successful as he pretends to, but he didn't go under, he recovered from
four or six bankruptcies, he owns a Boeing 757, he enjoyed fabulous tax deductions and a good sex life (at least on his own terms). He must have some sense of the
Art of the Deal
(the title of his ghostwritten book). Plus, he's lazy, we're informed,
although I don't believe that's true (I'm lazy myself, I know how it
is). Why-o-why should Trump bring the world down? At his age? He doesn't
hold deep convictions, except for some protectionist instincts and a
pliable xenophobia tempered by two foreign spouses. During all
that time he floated buoyantly in the worldly Manhattan society, unlike,
say, Adolf Hitler. Why should he bring the world down? Much easier to
sit in the Oval office, do a Ronald Reagan, sow discord among his
advisers, practice the Art of the Deal, and enjoy himself.
Just a thought.