We're on Facebook, and if you've followed the news about the 
great divide on the social networks, you know that liberal Facebook 
users share a common bubble per algorithm. So we only see what other 
liberals think and say (same for conservatives). And even if you're not 
on Facebook but on the mailing lists of The New York Times, The New 
Yorker, The London Book Review, etc., you know by now that the 
commentary---the commentary that you 
see---is adamant that we 
shouldn't be fooled by Trump's recent, concessionary posture. He'll be 
his true self again in the White House, he'll live up to his election 
promises, and bring the world down.
|  | 
| He floats in the worldly Manhattan society. | 
What
 if he doesn't? He's run some sort of business empire for 40 years---not
 as successful as he pretends to, but he didn't go under, he recovered from 
four or six bankruptcies, he owns a Boeing 757, he enjoyed fabulous tax deductions and a good sex life (at least on his own terms). He must have some sense of the 
Art of the Deal
 (the title of his ghostwritten book). Plus, he's lazy, we're informed, 
although I don't believe that's true (I'm lazy myself, I know how it 
is). Why-o-why should Trump bring the world down? At his age? He doesn't
 hold deep convictions, except for some protectionist instincts and a 
pliable xenophobia tempered by two foreign spouses. During all 
that time he floated buoyantly in the worldly Manhattan society, unlike,
 say, Adolf Hitler. Why should he bring the world down? Much easier to 
sit in the Oval office, do a Ronald Reagan, sow discord among his 
advisers, practice the Art of the Deal, and enjoy himself. 
Just a thought.