Another five star review for the Green Eyes:
What a delightful and tongue-in-cheek romp through the drama, the pitfalls and the high camp of gay love obsession!
In general, I'm not a fan of "erotic" books, but a friend recommended
this to me, and I must say that in spite of my reluctance, I was hooked
on the story from the first pages in, because the writing and plotting
is so outrageously witty, literate and engaging. John, the narrator, is a
hunk of attractive, dysfunctional gay
man, who is still partner-less and feeling washed out at approaching
that deadly age of 29. He meets Alex in the sand dunes of the "gay
beach" in his Georgia town, and the rest is a wild, and wonderfully
sardonic, ride through wild parties, back rooms, emergency rooms,
attempted murder, Georgia sodomy laws, and yes love, in a whole host of
hilarious and totally dysfunctional mini plots. With chapter headings
like "Richard Wagner and Ludwig the Second; Bavarian Leather Shorts;
Playing with my Caravaggio; In Flagrante Masterclass; Six Minutes to
Eighth Heaven; and Look Muffy, He Brought His Instruments" - well you
get the idea. There's plenty of sex, but even that's written in the
same, most entertaining, tongue-in-cheek manner. The writing style is
really original and the plotting, well, it's just totally crazy - but it
works great! I was well entertained - Green Eyes is delightfully
offbeat, and highly original.
Nov 30, 2015
Nov 28, 2015
AuthorsInterviews
Cool, folks, we've had a sit-down with Fiona Mcvie of AuthorsInterviews about the Green Eyes, and we held forth like there's no tomorrow.
They seem to have some really cool offices over there |
(Q: "Is there a message in your novel that you want readers to grasp?" A: "Yes and no. There are lots of messages. I don’t know whether you had this in High School, writing essays that would “interpret” a particular piece of literature. We had this a lot. The (implicit) question always was: “What does the author mean, what does he/she want to say?” Even then I thought the question beside the point. If you have a clear message, you write an opinion piece for the New York Times, you don’t write a novel, or a play, or a poem. Art---if that’s what we are doing---art is about ambiguity. There is no clear message, there shouldn’t be, in fact. The more ambiguity, the better"). Along those lines.
Nov 27, 2015
Nov 25, 2015
Google mis-search --- This is heaven --- (teaser)
(We're already in Chapter 5. Godehart has been tricked into underwriting the Festival Award of $$$ 100k, which explains the whiskeys. Alice, Godehart, Alex and John sit on the terrace of Nick's restaurant, and talk, yes, what, they talk neologisms:)
“If you control the website, you control the festival, more or less,” Alex says.
“This isn’t the festival site,” I say, “It’s my site.”
“Who would know?” Alex asks.
“Anybody who needs to know about the festival. It takes a split second to discover a mis-search. People have experience,” I say.
“Mis-search.” Alex’s tongue likes the word. “A bit heavy on the ear perhaps, but useful. The most frequently committed act of our era, mis-search, an act in dire need of a term. You invented this? ... Can you google ‘mis-search’?” he adds in Alice’s direction.
Alice---who should slap Alex’s wrist now and steer the conversation back to Godehart’s predicament---Alice says:“We have him back, we have him back.” She means Alex.
“I was like this before?” Alex asks.
“Yes, on a good day.”
“Well, this isn’t a good day,” Alex answers, “google ‘mis-search’.”
Alice googles “mis-search.”
Nada. Not one mis-search on Google. “A real neologism, John,” Alex says, and slaps my shoulder. “Dude. You are worth it.”
“If you control the website, you control the festival, more or less,” Alex says.
“This isn’t the festival site,” I say, “It’s my site.”
“Who would know?” Alex asks.
“Anybody who needs to know about the festival. It takes a split second to discover a mis-search. People have experience,” I say.
“Mis-search.” Alex’s tongue likes the word. “A bit heavy on the ear perhaps, but useful. The most frequently committed act of our era, mis-search, an act in dire need of a term. You invented this? ... Can you google ‘mis-search’?” he adds in Alice’s direction.
Alice---who should slap Alex’s wrist now and steer the conversation back to Godehart’s predicament---Alice says:“We have him back, we have him back.” She means Alex.
“I was like this before?” Alex asks.
“Yes, on a good day.”
“Well, this isn’t a good day,” Alex answers, “google ‘mis-search’.”
Alice googles “mis-search.”
Nada. Not one mis-search on Google. “A real neologism, John,” Alex says, and slaps my shoulder. “Dude. You are worth it.”
Nov 20, 2015
Thanks God (Tristan Verran)
Nov 19, 2015
Nov 14, 2015
We mourn the victims
A victim outside the Bataclan concert hall in Paris on Friday night |
“A body fell on me—it emptied blood on my legs. . . . My neighbor, a man of about fifty, was shot right in the face, in the head. Bits of brain and flesh fell on my glasses,” one blessed escapee from the theatre recollected. “I tried to keep my eyes on the floor, it was an immense flood of blood.” Another concertgoer, named Célia, recounted, “I saw the assailants clearly. I think there were four. Their faces weren’t hidden. All very young, in their twenties. Not especially handsome, but not at all devilish looking. They wore big tunics, one beige, and two all in black. The one in the beige tunic had a short beard. They were all Middle Eastern types but spoke French without any accent.” And another survivor remembered one of the attackers saying, “You have killed our brothers in Syria, now it’s your turn,” while they fired at the crowd. It was a non-stop fusillade, and a gunman shouted, “The first person who moves his ass, I’ll kill him.” Célia added, “My cell phone was lit because I was going to film parts of the concert, but I didn’t have it out. Good thing, because those who took theirs out were killed immediately.”
(Eyewitnesses, quoted in an article in The New Yorker)
Nov 8, 2015
Nov 6, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)